Skip to content

ED Copper Vs. RA (Rolled Annealed Copper) in PCB Industry

ED vs. rolled annealed copper PCB is a common question many electronics engineers have. Both types of copper are commonly ideal for PCB production, but which is better for your application? This article will provide an overview of the main differences between ED and rolled annealed copper. Read on to learn more!

ED copper

The present study demonstrates the influence of various heat treatment methods on the fracture strain of rolled copper. For example, a 10 um thick copper foil subjected to salient heat treatment increased its fracture strain by 0.2 to 15%. Predictive simulations of PCB structure films need consistent information about the effects of different heat treatments on copper films. We can achieve this through the characterization of copper film properties.

In the fabrication process of PCBs, copper foils are rolled from a copper block and then annealed at high temperatures. The resultant copper foils are smooth and have lamellar crystal structures. Therefore, they are suitable for thin consumer applications and are also flexible. However, rolled-annealed copper has poor bending resistance and is not ideal for high-speed dynamic applications.

The cyclic folding/unfolding test of rolled annealed copper yields results in a map of the longitudinal stress component. However, the maximum strain is less than one percent of the maximum force. Thus, the maximum strain of ED copper PCB rolled annealed samples is smaller than the load value to avoid buckling of the sample.

RA Copper has a surface roughness of 0.35 microns RMS, while ED copper has a slightly rougher side. The smooth side of ED copper is slightly rougher than RA Copper. This slight roughness enhances adhesion with the laminate while increasing the insertion loss and resistance. These are essential factors for PCB manufacture. Rayming PCB & Assembly help you determine which type of copper is best suited for your needs.

RA copper

RA copper and ED are both forms of copper foil. ED copper is better for PCB products that don’t require much bending. RA copper is more bendable, but it does cost more. You should compare both types of copper to determine which one is best for your PCB. Here are some differences between the two. First, let’s look at the benefits of ED and RA copper. These materials have varying degrees of electrical conductivity and bendability.

RA copper is used extensively for flex circuits and rigid-flex PCB fabrication. It has a smooth surface, ideal for dynamic, flexible circuitry. It is also a good choice for high-frequency signals, as copper surface roughness affects the insertion loss of RF and microwave signals. RA copper has a smoother surface than ED copper, making it an ideal choice for such applications.

RA copper provides smoother and denser surfaces, making it better for flexible PCBs. Unlike ED copper, RA copper has better thermal and bending properties than ED copper. The disadvantages of RA copper are largely related to its thickness. ED copper is not as flexible as RA copper, but the latter is a more expensive choice for PCBs that require a flexible surface. However, RA copper’s higher conductivity and smoother surface make it better for high-frequency PCBs.

RA copper vs. rolled annealed copper

The flexibility of copper depends on several factors. The thinner a copper is, the more flexible it is. The grain structure of copper also affects its flexibility. Rolled annealed copper has a horizontal grain structure, while Electro Deposited copper is vertical. Both types of copper do not promote flexibility and signal integrity. The following are some of the advantages of rolled annealed copper PCB.

ED copper has higher conductivity and lower manufacturing costs. In addition, its annealing process increases the flexibility of copper and improves its flexibility. As a result, both types of copper are ideal for PCBs. However, there are some essential differences between the two. One of these is the type of copper. ED copper is more brittle, while RA copper is more flexible. As a result, RA copper is better for bendable PCBs, and electrodeposited copper is more expensive.

Which is better?

When comparing ED copper and rolled annealed copper for PCBs, a common question is: Which is better? Of course, both materials have their benefits, but what’s the difference? The two types of copper have some similarities and differences and some crucial differences. Read on to learn more about each. This article aims to answer that question and explain what makes each type superior.

When comparing ED copper and rolled annealed copper for PCBs, the difference between the two types of copper foil is most apparent in the grain structure of the materials. ED copper foils feature fine, medium, and coarse grain structures, allowing designers to choose from the roughest or smoothest surfaces. Likewise, additional treatments can make the copper foil conductive and increase adhesion and compatibility.

While RA copper is softer than ED copper, it is still an excellent choice for flexible boards. Because of its higher conductivity, ED copper is low-cost to PCB manufacturers. However, if you’re designing a PCB that needs to be bent a lot, you’ll want to choose RA copper. But if you’re not sure which is better, read this article to learn more about the differences between the two types of copper.

ED copper is the de facto choice for consumer electronics applications, such as cell phones and digital cameras. The low weight of ED copper means that it requires high cycle rates and careful control of “additive” plating. On the other hand, RA copper is better for more complex, heavier applications that require high current and higher weight. Whether a circuit is dynamic or static, it is essential to consider the underlying material.

Mechanical properties

When considering the differences between ED copper and rolled annealed copper PCBs, it is essential to understand their differences in mechanical properties. ED copper, for example, has superior mechanical properties in applications that experience high thermal stress and mechanical stress. On the other hand, RA copper has excellent thermal cycling resistance, making it a better choice for thermally demanding applications.

When evaluating ED copper vs. rolled annealed copper PCBs, remember that ED copper has a smoother surface than RA copper. ED copper is, therefore, an excellent choice for PCB products where bending is not an issue. This is due to its excellent conductivity, but its tensile strength and elastic elongation are lower. On the other hand, RA copper is ideal for PCB products requiring significant bending and flexing.

On the other hand, RA copper is a popular choice for rigid-flex PCB fabrication and flex circuits manufacturing. Its smooth surface and grain structure make it ideal for dynamic, flexible circuitry. However, while both types of copper have their advantages, RA copper is better suited for high-frequency signals and rigid-flex PCBs. The surface texture of RA copper is slightly smoother than that of ED copper, which is better suitable for applications where the conductivity is critical.