TWO METHODS OF DEVELOPING WIRING PATTERNS FOR PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS IN 2024

“We’ve trusted Rayming with multiple PCB orders, and they’ve never disappointed. Their manufacturing process is top-tier, and their team is always helpful. A+ service!”

I have had excellent service from RayMing PCB over 10 years. Your engineers have helped me and saved me many times.

Rayming provides top-notch PCB assembly services at competitive prices. Their customer support is excellent, and they always go the extra mile to ensure satisfaction. A trusted partner!

In the ever-evolving world of electronics, printed circuit boards (PCBs) remain a fundamental component of almost every electronic device. As we progress through 2024, the methods for developing wiring patterns on PCBs continue to advance, offering improved precision, efficiency, and capabilities. This article will explore two primary methods of developing wiring patterns for PCBs: the subtractive method and the additive method. We’ll delve into the intricacies of each approach, discussing their processes, advantages, limitations, and applications in the context of current industry trends and technological advancements.

The Subtractive Method

Overview of the Subtractive Method

The subtractive method, also known as the etching method, has been the traditional approach to PCB manufacturing for many decades. This method involves removing unwanted copper from a fully copper-clad board to create the desired circuit pattern.

Process Steps

1. Material Preparation

Fr4 Laminate
Fr4 Laminate

The process begins with a base material, typically a sheet of insulating substrate (such as FR-4 epoxy glass) fully clad with a thin layer of copper on one or both sides.

2. Cleaning

The copper surface is thoroughly cleaned to remove any contaminants that could interfere with the subsequent steps.

3. Photoresist Application

A layer of photoresist, a light-sensitive material, is applied to the copper surface. This can be done through:

  • Liquid photoresist application
  • Dry film lamination

4. Pattern Transfer

The circuit pattern is transferred onto the photoresist layer. This is typically done through one of two methods:

  • Photolithography: Using a photomask and UV light exposure
  • Direct imaging: Using laser technology to directly “draw” the pattern

5. Development

The board is treated with a chemical developer, which removes the exposed (or unexposed, depending on the type of photoresist) areas of the photoresist, leaving behind a pattern that protects the desired copper traces.

6. Etching

The board is subjected to an etching solution (commonly ferric chloride or ammonium persulfate) that removes the exposed copper, leaving only the protected copper traces.

7. Resist Stripping

The remaining photoresist is stripped away, revealing the final copper pattern.

8. Additional Processing

Depending on the specific requirements, additional steps may include:

  • Applying solder mask
  • Silkscreen printing
  • Surface finish application (e.g., HASL, ENIG)

Advantages of the Subtractive Method

  1. Well-established process with decades of refinement
  2. Suitable for high-volume production
  3. Can produce very fine line widths and spaces
  4. Compatible with a wide range of board materials
  5. Relatively low cost for large-scale production

Limitations of the Subtractive Method

  1. Material waste due to copper removal
  2. Environmental concerns related to etching chemicals
  3. Potential for underetching or overetching
  4. Difficulties in achieving consistent copper thickness
  5. Challenges in producing thick copper traces

Recent Advancements in Subtractive Method (2024)

As of 2024, several advancements have been made to improve the subtractive method:

  1. Eco-friendly Etchants: Development of more environmentally friendly etching solutions to address environmental concerns.
  2. Advanced Photoresists: New photoresist materials with improved resolution and stability, allowing for finer line widths and spaces.
  3. Precision Etching Control: Implementation of advanced process control systems using AI and machine learning to optimize etching parameters in real-time.
  4. Hybrid Processes: Combination of subtractive methods with semi-additive processes for improved performance in specific applications.
  5. Direct Imaging Enhancements: Advancements in direct imaging technology, including higher resolution and faster processing speeds.

The Additive Method

Overview of the Additive Method

The additive method, as the name suggests, involves selectively adding conductive material to create the circuit pattern, rather than removing it. This approach has gained significant traction in recent years due to its potential for reduced material waste and ability to create unique structures.

Types of Additive Methods

1. Fully Additive Process

In a fully additive process, the entire conductive pattern is built up on a non-conductive substrate.

2. Semi-Additive Process

This hybrid approach starts with a thin conductive layer and builds up the required circuit pattern.

Process Steps for Fully Additive Method

1. Substrate Preparation

A non-conductive substrate is prepared, which may include surface treatment for improved adhesion.

2. Catalyzation

The substrate surface is treated with a catalyst to promote the deposition of conductive material.

3. Pattern Definition

The circuit pattern is defined using one of several methods:

  • Selective deposition of catalyst
  • Masking techniques
  • Direct writing technologies

4. Electroless Plating

An initial layer of copper is deposited through electroless plating, which doesn’t require electrical current.

5. Pattern Build-up

The copper traces are built up to the required thickness, typically through electroplating.

6. Additional Processing

Similar to the subtractive method, additional steps may include solder mask application, silkscreen printing, and surface finish application.

Advantages of the Additive Method

  1. Reduced material waste
  2. Ability to create unique structures (e.g., high aspect ratio traces)
  3. Potential for finer line widths and spaces
  4. More uniform copper thickness
  5. Reduced environmental impact due to less chemical waste

Limitations of the Additive Method

  1. Generally slower process compared to subtractive method
  2. Higher cost for large-scale production
  3. May require specialized equipment
  4. Potential adhesion issues between deposited copper and substrate
  5. Limited track record compared to subtractive method

Recent Advancements in Additive Method (2024)

As of 2024, the additive method has seen significant advancements:

  1. 3D Printed Electronics: Integration of additive PCB manufacturing with 3D printing technologies for creating complex, three-dimensional circuit structures.
  2. Nanomaterial Inks: Development of highly conductive inks using nanomaterials for improved performance and finer resolution.
  3. Selective Laser Sintering: Advancements in laser technology for direct metal deposition and sintering of conductive traces.
  4. Roll-to-Roll Processing: Implementation of continuous additive processes for high-volume, flexible PCB production.
  5. Multi-material Deposition: Capability to deposit multiple materials (conductors, insulators, resistors) in a single process for integrated passive components.

Comparison of Subtractive and Additive Methods

To better understand the differences between these two methods, let’s compare them across several key factors:

FactorSubtractive MethodAdditive Method
Material EfficiencyLower (copper waste)Higher (minimal waste)
Production SpeedFaster for high volumeGenerally slower
Line Width/Space ResolutionGood (down to ~50μm)Excellent (potential for <25μm)
Copper Thickness ControlChallenging for thick tracesBetter control across range
Environmental ImpactHigher (etching chemicals)Lower (less chemical waste)
Cost for Large-Scale ProductionLowerHigher
Flexibility in DesignGoodExcellent (3D structures possible)
Industry AdoptionWidely adoptedGrowing adoption
Equipment RequirementsWell-establishedMay require specialized equipment

Applications and Use Cases

Subtractive Method Applications

  1. High-Volume Consumer Electronics: Smartphones, laptops, TVs
  2. Automotive Electronics: Engine control units, infotainment systems
  3. Industrial Control Systems: PLCs, SCADA systems
  4. Telecommunications Equipment: Routers, switches, base stations

Additive Method Applications

  1. Aerospace and Defense: Lightweight, high-performance circuits
  2. Medical Devices: Miniaturized implantable devices, wearable health monitors
  3. Internet of Things (IoT) Devices: Sensors, smart home devices
  4. Flexible and Stretchable Electronics: Wearable technology, conformable circuits

Future Trends and Innovations

As we look beyond 2024, several trends are shaping the future of PCB wiring pattern development:

  1. Convergence of Methods: Hybrid approaches combining the strengths of both subtractive and additive methods.
  2. Artificial Intelligence in Design: AI-driven design tools for optimizing circuit layouts and manufacturing processes.
  3. Sustainable Manufacturing: Increased focus on environmentally friendly materials and processes.
  4. Nanotechnology Integration: Incorporation of nanomaterials and nanostructures for enhanced performance.
  5. Flexible and Stretchable Circuits: Continued development of technologies for non-rigid electronic devices.
  6. High-Frequency and High-Speed Applications: Advancements in materials and processes to support 5G, 6G, and beyond.
  7. Miniaturization: Pushing the boundaries of line width and spacing for increasingly compact devices.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  1. Q: Which method is better for high-volume production: subtractive or additive? A: Currently, the subtractive method is generally more suitable for high-volume production due to its faster processing times and lower costs at scale. However, as additive technologies continue to advance, this gap is narrowing, especially for certain specialized applications.
  2. Q: Can the additive method produce multi-layer PCBs? A: Yes, the additive method can be used to produce multi-layer PCBs. In fact, it offers some advantages in this area, such as the ability to create buried vias more easily. However, the process can be more complex and time-consuming compared to traditional multi-layer PCB manufacturing using the subtractive method.
  3. Q: What are the environmental benefits of the additive method? A: The primary environmental benefits of the additive method include reduced material waste, as it only deposits the necessary copper rather than etching away excess, and potentially lower use of harsh chemicals compared to the etching processes in the subtractive method. This can result in a smaller environmental footprint and align better with sustainable manufacturing practices.
  4. Q: Is it possible to combine subtractive and additive methods in a single PCB manufacturing process? A: Yes, hybrid processes that combine elements of both subtractive and additive methods are being developed and used. These hybrid approaches aim to leverage the strengths of each method. For example, a semi-additive process might start with a thin copper layer (subtractive step) and then build up the traces to the required thickness (additive step).
  5. Q: How do the two methods compare in terms of achieving fine line widths and spaces? A: While both methods can achieve fine line widths and spaces, the additive method generally has the potential for finer resolutions. Advanced additive processes can potentially achieve line widths and spaces below 25μm, while subtractive methods typically bottom out around 50μm for production processes. However, the actual achievable resolution depends on various factors including the specific technologies and materials used.