Skip to content

Does Nvidia Use FPGA in Machine Learning?

Does Nvidia use FPGA? This article answers this question by explaining how it is helpful in machine learning workloads. First, you will learn how these chips are energy efficient, and we can customize them for AI and safety requirements. Next, find out why you should use these processors and why they’re better than GPUs. Then, you’ll be able to decide whether these chips are suitable for your workload. Ultimately, you’ll be better off with one of these processors.

Nvidia FPGA for machine learning workloads

Unlike traditional hardware, FPGAs are programmable and can solve any computable problem. The technology has been around for a decade. This new technology enables developers to speed up compute-intensive applications and reduces the complexity of ASIC development. However, the performance of an FPGA will not be close to the performance of a high-end GPU.

Despite the many advantages of GPUs, the cost remains one of the biggest deterrents. While GPUs are superior to FPGAs in some applications, they are not without their disadvantages. Intel, for example, can offer CPUs and FPGAs on the same chip, thereby reducing the cost of a GPU.

The FPGA’s customizable components allow designers to fine-tune the hardware to meet the specific needs of machine learning workloads. For example, INT8 quantization is an efficient way to optimize machine learning frameworks. It can reduce memory usage, bandwidth, and computing requirements when used properly. This also helps meet power efficiency requirements. The new technology is also available through Microsoft‘s Azure cloud service.

As machine learning applications become more common, the need for more efficient hardware for training machine learning models has increased. In recent years, manufacturers have developed new hardware with advanced AI capabilities. While GPUs have many advantages, FPGAs also provide advantages that CPUs do not have. One of these benefits is customizing hardware to match specific deep learning models. Lastly, FPGAs are better at streaming data, which requires pipelined-oriented processing.

Nvidia has been using FPGAs to accelerate AI systems for years and recently expanded support for Arm CPUs. While Arm processors are not as efficient as Intel or AMD, their power requirements are incredibly low, making them attractive to data centers.

They are more energy-efficient than GPUs

Why are FPGAs better than GPUs? Several factors contribute to this conclusion. First, the FPGA has a programmable hardware fabric and is more energy-efficient than a traditional GPU. AMD, for example, has announced plans to release low-power Ryzen Embedded processors. Low-power processors can be found in mobile devices and are more efficient than GPUs. AMD’s Ryzen Embedded processors are among the first processors to include an FPGA.

Another factor determining which is better is power consumption. A GPU consumes around 116.7 Watts per core compared to 50-250 Watts for an FPGA. In contrast, a GPU can run at temperatures as high as 158 °C. In general, though, the better-performing FPGA has more RAM, faster processing, and a lower power bill.

The FPGA also offers designers the ability to fine-tune the hardware. For example, FPGAs can perform machine learning frameworks much faster than a GPU, and we can configure them multiple times to serve multiple purposes throughout their lifecycle. On the other hand, GPUs are better suited for target applications that require high processing power.

Another reason why FPGAs are better is that we can customize them after manufacturing. For example, one FPGA can perform image analysis. A single FPGA implementation can perform 1.2x faster than a GPU, and the same algorithm on both platforms can help create a higher-performance GPU.

As for the latency, a GPU cannot compete with an FPGA. The former is faster at computing integers, while the latter can quickly handle logic and bulk floating-point operations. However, the FPGA is about twice as expensive as a GPU, so its energy efficiency is less critical. But it’s important to consider these two factors when choosing the right hardware for your floating-point workload.

They can work with AI

With the latest generation of FPGAs, developers can fine-tune the hardware to meet the specific needs of AI applications. Nvidia has created a special version of the Stratix 10 NX that supports the newest generation of Tensor Cores and AI Tensor Operations. INT8 quantization is a highly successful technique for boosting machine learning frameworks, and it delivers promising outcomes when it comes to hardware toolchains. It uses 8-bit integers in place of floating-point numbers & effectively meets power efficiency requirements.

Besides developing specialized hardware for AI, Nvidia is also offering customized software development kits, such as DriveWorks. These software tools help developers interpret data from cameras used in self-driving cars. By offering customized solutions, semiconductor companies will enjoy greater developer preference, higher adoption rates, and increased customer loyalty. But before investing in an FPGA, companies should consider the pain points they want to solve with AI and determine whether they need hardware for the edge of the data center.

Unlike their earlier generations, leading-edge FPGAs can be custom programmed for AI. Unfortunately, the complexity of FPGA programming makes them difficult to program. But Rayming PCB & Assembly has overcome this problem with a new platform that makes FPGA programming much simpler. Developers can quickly and easily port their deep learning code onto FPGA hardware with this new platform. And this is a promising move for the future of AI hardware.

They can work with safety requirements

Flexibility. FPGAs are a key element of modern computer architecture. They offer flexibility by allowing developers to integrate more functions than they could in a conventional system. This is important to manufacturers because the same hardware can meet various safety requirements. Further, FPGAs can be tested parallel with the software, saving time during commissioning and testing. For instance, SmartNICs, a type of FPGA device, can allow the changing of the software without affecting the hardware.

Safety-critical systems must be reliable. This means that the system must not fail due to external or internal factors. A failure in these systems could be fatal, as in California’s 2008 Chatsworth train crash, when two oncoming trains collided head-on on a single-track section. Another recent accident involved a car on the road in Arizona, where a technical failure prevented the vehicle from stopping.

The FPGA consists of logical modules connected by routing channels. Each module contains a programmable lookup table to control the elements of each cell. In addition to cascaded adders, FPGAs also contains registers and multiplexers for switching and memory functions. In addition, programmable logic modules are often helpful in creating safety-related components, such as a fingerprint reader.

Flexibility is another crucial aspect of FPGAs. The flexibility of the design allows designers to modify the hardware without redesigning the entire board. As a result, a single hardware solution is suitable for various applications. A good example is FPGAs in medical applications. The flexibility of FPGAs allows designers to create customized hardware that meets their needs while adhering to various safety requirements.

HDL code is helpful for the initial programming of an FPGA. In addition, it is a readable language used for developing programmable logic.